위증
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. From around 1995, the Defendant was entrusted by five persons, such as F, etc., the owner of the land related to Gyeonggi-gun, Gyeonggi-gun, and 361,434 square meters E, and the Defendant. G, from around 2001 to Oct. 10, 201, purchased shot trees in the above E from the above F, etc. (a contract signed on behalf of the Defendant) and 36 weeks in July 8, 2008, the Defendant purchased 401 shot trees in KRW 36 million on August 17, 2009, KRW 34,650,000,000, but the above E’s four projects were incorporated into the Government’s “four major projects,” and thereafter, G, from around 201 to around October 4, 2010, the land owner and the land owner filed for the disposal of shot trees in accordance with the Korea Water Resources Corporation’s decision.
4.15.
4. On 3 days including 19.19., when the court enforcement officer conducted the disposal of the shot trees located in the above E in the presence of the court enforcement officer, the disposal became a serious legal dispute.
On September 8, 2011, the Defendant appears to have made ex officio correction because, at the court of law No. 2 of Suwon District Court No. 2, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant), F, I, the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff), G, and H, 2011 plus 2010Gahap2999, 2019, 20199, it is clear that the Defendant was a clerical error in the manner of 2011Gahap299. Accordingly, the Defendant’s agent appeared to take an oath as a witness of the instant case, such as a request for the delivery of land No. 2011Gahap1919 (Joint), and asked the Defendant’s agent “I” to answer the question, “I”, “A witness is a person who cultivates Gogu, and K is a person who is aware of Y and K,” and “I” to the effect that the Defendant’s agent is to prepare for all of the Plaintiff’s warranty and bond management facilities owned by the Defendant as a surety around March 5, 2010.