보상금증액
1. The Defendant: (a) 22,454,890 won to Plaintiff A; (b) 2,600,000 won to Plaintiff B; (c) 6,083,300 won to Plaintiff C; and (d) 2,709.
Project name, such as project approval and announcement of the process of adjudication - Project approval and announcement: Free economic zone development project (I development project (hereinafter referred to as the "project of this case"): Public announcement: J of the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy as of September 3, 2013 - Project operator: The subject of expropriation by the defendant and Pyeongtaek Urban Corporation as well as the subject of expropriation - Each land listed in the list of land to be expropriated (hereinafter referred to as "each land of this case").
The Central Land Tribunal's ruling of acceptance on November 20, 2014 and the ruling on objection made on August 20, 2015 - The date of expropriation: The date of commencement of expropriation: The appraisal corporation of this ruling on December 22, 2014 - The Pacific Appraisal Corporation, the Central Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Appraisal") - The amount of compensation for losses: The same shall apply to the amount stated in the column of "the amount of objection" in the list of the amount of compensation for losses attached hereto.
【In the absence of dispute, there is no ground for recognition】A evidence Nos. 1 through 9, 1, and 2-1 through 9 of the evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 2-1 and 2-2 of the evidence Nos. 1 and 2-2 of the Plaintiff’s assertion on the purport of the entire pleadings, and the Plaintiff’s assertion on each of the instant lands in which the Plaintiff asserted as follows: ① 4,788m2,086m2,06m2,000 and M21m21m2, ③ Plaintiff G and H owned 21,489/79,144 of each share of 21,738m2 (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) were used for the same purpose as “the former Forestry Products Control Act (amended by Act No. 635, Jun. 27, 1961; hereinafter “former Forest Products Control Act”) or the previous land for the same purpose.
Although each of the lands of this case is assessed before and after considering the current utilization situation, the appraisal appraiser of this case presented each of the above reclaimed lands as "forest" which is its land category, and assessed each of the lands of this case as "forest". In assessing each of the lands of this case, the appraisal appraiser of this case made compensation for losses for each of the above lands due to errors such as selection of comparative standard land, error of publication, etc.