도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
1. The punishment of the accused shall be determined by one year and two months;
2.Provided, That the above punishment shall be imposed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;
Punishment of the crime
On June 11, 2012, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 2 million from the Daejeon District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Busan District Court's Branch on the same crime as a violation of road traffic law (driving), and violated the prohibition of drinking driving regulations at least twice.
[2017 Highest 518] On June 30, 2017, the Defendant driven a Clatera car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.157% in alcohol while under the influence of alcohol at approximately 0.157%, without obtaining a driver’s license on the section of about 5km from the front to the front road at the Han-gu Seoul Han-ro, Jin-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (U.S. 00:55 on the same day) around 809.
[2017 Highest 649]
1. On July 4, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a CG car without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 150 meters from the front of the “EM” road located in the Sinsan-si, Seog-si, Seog-si, Jin-si, Jinsan-si, to the front of the “EM” road located in D.
2. On July 4, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of drinking), like paragraph 1, on July 4, 2017, when driving a Crane HG car, and was in front of EM, and was locked inside the car by the alcohol transport operator. On the same day, the Defendant was broken out by the police box of the Jiner Police Station, who was dispatched to the site at around 02:20 on the same day, by the police box belonging to the police box of the Jiner Police Station, G, and patrolmen.
At the time, the defendant was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as a red, a red and walking state of walking, and an answer to the questions of the police officer, etc.
Despite the fact that there are reasonable grounds to determine a person, the police officer did not respond to a police officer’s request for alcohol testing on three occasions (the first: 02:38, 02: 03: 02: 03, 03: 3: 02: 02: 02: 02: 48) without justifiable grounds, despite the police officer’s request to comply with the alcohol testing method by inserting the whole lab of alcohol measuring instruments.
Summary of Evidence
1. Previous convictions: Inquiry of criminal history, each of them;