2. In full view of various circumstances, including the following: (a) the Defendant’s working as an employee of the victim company for a long-term period of embezzlement of the price of goods received; (b) consumed them for personal purposes; and (c) deleted computerized data on the sales of the company to conceal the facts of his/her criminal act; (d) the method of the crime was inadequate; (b) the liability for the crime was also heavy; and (c) the victim company did not recover from damage until the trial was in fact; and (d) the victim company requested a strict punishment against the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s punishment conditions for sentencing, such as the age-oriented environment

3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is groundless. It is so decided as per Disposition.