When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On September 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 13:25, around 13:25, 2014, at the front taxi platform of the Gohapcheon-gun, D (Nam, 58 years old); (b) she was fluored with her own fluore, E, E, a private taxiF (ma, 64 years old) parked on the taxi platform; and (c) she was able to take a bath to “Ye flue fluore fluor,” and (d) caused damage to the property equivalent to KRW 641,826 of the market price, such as she was fluoring the first fluoring the second fluor of the said individual taxi, even twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and D;

1. A report on internal investigation (Attachment to four copies of photographs that cause damage to taxi property);

1. Application of the written estimate for repair costs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that a number of criminal records against the defendant for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act has many criminal records of violence, and that the crime of this case has been committed during the repeated crime period constitutes disadvantageous circumstances. However, a fine shall be imposed against the defendant by taking into account the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant led to the confession of the crime, the defendant seems to have committed the crime, and the fact that his mistake appears to have been divided, the damage to property is not limited, the partial repayment of the amount of