손실보상금
1. The Defendant: (a) from May 20, 2015, against Plaintiff A, KRW 104,240,40; and (b) against Plaintiff B, KRW 164,296,440; and (c) each said money.
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project name: C Public Housing Project (hereinafter “instant project”);
2) A project implementer: A public notice of authorization to implement the project of the Defendant (the name is changed from EP on September 1, 2016 to Seoul Housing and Urban Corporation) (the name is changed from EP to EP): D public notice of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 26, 2010.
B. On March 26, 2015, the Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation (hereinafter “instant ruling of expropriation”): The date of expropriation: May 19, 2015, 2015; - The objects of expropriation - Each land indicated in the column for objects of expropriation in the attached Table 1 appraisal report (the Plaintiff is seeking an increase in compensation for all the land, and thus, the entry of the obstacle is omitted; hereinafter “each land of this case”). The land subject to expropriation is indicated in the column for the amount of adjudication of expropriation in the attached Table 1 appraisal report: An appraisal corporation and a national appraisal corporation (hereinafter “appraisals of expropriation”). The appraisal result is referred to as “the result of the appraisal of expropriation”).
C. Compensation by the Central Land Tribunal on December 17, 2015 (hereinafter “instant judgment”): Each entry in the column for the amount of compensation for the instant judgment as a result of the appraisal in attached Table 1 attached Table 2: An appraisal corporation, one appraisal corporation, and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter “Appraisals”) (hereinafter “Objection”) (hereinafter “Appraisals”) (the result of the appraisal; “the result of the appraisal of objection”; and the result of the appraisal is “the result of the appraisal of the objection”; hereinafter “appraisals”) (based on the recognition”), is without dispute; (a) evidence Nos. 1 through 4; (b) evidence Nos. 1 through 4; and (c) evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including the main number; hereinafter the same shall apply); and (d) the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) Attached Table 1 land No. 1 in the table as a result of the appraisal of attached Table 1 (hereinafter "land No. 1 in this case").
The land category on the public register is forest land, but in fact, Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E (Seoul Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government address and two parcels outside of F.