모욕
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. 항소이유의 요지 이 사건 공소사실의 요지는, 「피고인은 2018. 5. 24. 10:50경 부산 해운대구 B 아파트 C동 저층 엘리베이터 안에서, 피해자 D으로부터 피해자의 남편과 피고인 사이의 불륜관계를 의심하는 내용의 말을 듣자 다른 입주민 등이 있는 가운데 피해자에게, “미쳤는갑다. 너 진짜 정신 또라이인갑다.”고 말하고, 계속하여 위 아파트 보안팀장 E 등이 있는 가운데 피해자에게, “완전히 정신 또라이다”, “나는 너처럼 지저분한 인간이 아니다.”, “지랄하고 있네. 니 완전히 꾼이다. 꾼 짓을 하고 있다.”, “너 진짜 미친갱이다. 중대가리 빡빡 될지 알아라. 이 미친 것아.”라고 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.」는 것이다.
The court below held that the defendant's above act was not unlawful since it was a legitimate act that does not violate the social rules as stipulated in Article 20 of the Criminal Act or a legitimate act of self-defense as stipulated in Article 21 (1) of the Criminal Act, since the defendant's above act constituted a legitimate act that does not violate the social rules.
However, the above insult by the defendant cannot constitute a legitimate act or self-defense because it lacks legitimacy, means or methods of the purpose, reasonableness of legal interests, balance of legal interests, urgency, and supplement.
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles.
2. The lower court rendered a judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the facts charged of this case on the grounds that the Defendant’s act of entering the facts charged constitutes a legitimate act as provided in Article 20 of the Criminal Act or a legitimate self-defense as provided in Article 21(1)
Examining the judgment of the court below closely by comparing it with the records, the judgment of the court below is justified.