도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On October 21, 2005, around 17:53 on October 21, 2005, the Defendant’s employee A violated the Defendant’s vehicle operation restriction by carrying freight of more than 4.3 meters exceeding 4 meters in height on the knife-si’s knife-si’s 45th knife-si’s knife-si’s knife-si.
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005, and wholly amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case was declared as unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court Order No. 2008HunGa17 of Jul. 30, 2009, and accordingly, the above provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.
3. As the facts charged in the instant case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence is rendered pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and a summary of the judgment of the Defendant is publicly announced pursuant to Article 58