When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was driving a motor vehicle in the C District located in B on June 11, 2016 at around 00:00 on June 11, 2016; (b) the Defendant was driving a motor vehicle while driving a motor vehicle in front of D on June 11, 2016 at around 00:00; (c) the Defendant was making a traffic accident while driving a motor vehicle in front of D on June 11,

A false statement was prepared and submitted to H, a police officer in charge, to H.

Accordingly, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above G escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer against the defendant or G;

1. A written statement related to the I traffic accident;

1. Entry and existing descriptions of A's written statement related to traffic accidents;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (investigation into a wooden person);

1. Article 151 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 151 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not have any record of criminal punishment prior to the instant crime, and the punishment is determined as ordered by taking into account both the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, relationship with G who is the Defendant and the teacher, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments.