except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 01:00 on August 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) while gambling with a 'D' office in Mad' in Mani-si, the Defendant inflicted on the victim E (50 years of age) and Si expenses; (b) the face and chest part of the victim as a head of the 'D' office in Mani-si; (c) the Defendant sent the suspect, who is a dangerous object in the office, caused two weeks of medical treatment to the victim; and (d) the Defendant inflicted on the victim, upon the head of the 'D' office in Mai-si, two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Third and fourth police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the suspect who is represented by the suspect;

1. Articles 3 (1) and 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of inflicting an injury on a dangerous object);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the following grounds: (a) the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is against the defendant; (b) the victim does not wish to punish; and (c) the victim does not have any