물품대금
1. The Defendants jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 44,400,000 and Defendant B with respect thereto from August 12, 2014 to May 15, 2015.
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments as to the cause of the claim Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 9, the plaintiff is a corporation that processes and distributes livestock products. The defendant Eul registered the business with the trade name "FE E" as the location of "YEE". The defendant C registered the business with the trade name "I" as the location of "I". The defendant C is the husband's wife, and the defendant Eul was the husband's husband and wife, consulted with JJ and Matry price of the first plaintiff's representative, the defendant C delivered the name of an employee stated as "representative" of FEt to the plaintiff. The plaintiff supplied the above defendant's business name notice from April 11, 2014 to August 11, 2014 to the defendant Eul's "FEE" as the trade name "FE H", and the defendant C registered the business name with the trade name "I" as the location of "FE H" as the trade name of "I" and the remaining amount deposited with the defendant or the plaintiff.
According to the above facts, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay 4,400,000 won for the goods unpaid to the plaintiff as well as damages for delay calculated at a rate of 20% per annum from August 12, 2014, the day following the last transaction day to May 15, 2015, which is the day of service of a copy of the complaint in this case, and 6% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment, and 20% per annum from the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment, and Defendant C is liable to pay damages for delay calculated at a rate of 10% per annum from August 12, 2014, which is the day of delivery of a copy of the complaint in this case, to May 11, 2015, and
(1) The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified within the scope of recognition. (3) The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified. (4) The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is with merit. (4) The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is without merit.