However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2013. 2. 16. 04:30경 성남시 수정구 C에 있는 피해자 D(여, 51세) 운영의 ‘E주점’의 룸에서 피해자와 함께 술을 마시다가 피해자로부터 빌려준 돈을 달라는 요구를 받자 화가 나 손으로 피해자의 머리채를 잡고 위 룸의 구석으로 밀어붙인 후 그곳 탁자 위에 있던 위험한 물건인 양주병을 손으로 집어 들어 피해자의 이마 부위를 1회, 머리 부위를 3회 내려친 다음 주먹으로 오른 팔 부위를 3회 때리고 발로 오른쪽 허벅지 부위를 3회 찼다.

As a result, the defendant carried dangerous articles with the victim, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as cerebral cerebral dye in detail, in which there is no open room for treatment for about 21 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement by the prosecution concerning D;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate (22 pages of investigation records);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1148, Jan. 1, 201; 201Do1114, Jan. 2,

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the grounds for discretionary mitigation);

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;