When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who operates ‘D' in C.

1. The Defendant demanded, around May 2015, the victim E, a foreign worker who worked in the above factory, and did not receive wages from the above factory, to change the victim E, who was a foreign worker, with the knowledge that E was an illegal resident, and thereby, to E “in the manner of four mind” with the knowledge that E was an illegal resident.

Cr cannot be said to be an illegal sojourner.

It shall be abandoned as a declaration of illegal stay.

“Intimidating E”, “E was threatened.

2. Around December 2015, the Defendant requested F to request the victim F, a foreign worker, who was employed in the above plant and did not receive any wage in return for a telephone call. The Defendant knew F that F had been illegally staying in the Republic of Korea and knew F that F had been illegally staying in the Republic of Korea.

The four factories are also aware of the establishment of four factories.

“Intimidating F,” the term “F.

3. On August 2014, the Defendant demanded G to find the victim G, a foreign worker who was working in the above plant and did not receive benefits in the above plant, along with his wife, and demand G to pay benefits. As the Defendant knew that G was an illegal resident, he would not pay the money.

Mahman’s mind and mind.

B. I will report the widths to the police station as an illegal suspect.

“The Commission threatened G by stating that “....”

4. The Defendant: (a) around December 2014, at the above D around December 2014, the victim H, a foreign worker, who worked in the above D plant, will break one week.

In other words, H knows that H is an illegal staying person and found in the accommodation and reported to H as an illegal staying person at the inside of the width.

“Intimidating H was threatened.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. Each protocol of examination of a witness with respect to E, F, G, and H;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of each record of counseling (No. 3, 6, and 9) ;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.