On January 22, 2011, the Defendant, at around 10:00, inflicted injury on the victim, such as the Plaintiff’s breath and breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath, and the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the b

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the burden of proving the facts constituting an offense prosecuted is to be borne by the public prosecutor, and the conviction is to be based on the evidence of probative value, which makes the judge sure that the facts charged are true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant, it shall be determined with the benefit of the defendant.

B. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the evidence presented by the Prosecutor alone was that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the victim as stated in the facts charged.

The recognition is insufficient, and there is no other evidence to prove it.

1) The Defendant, in an investigative agency and this court, “The victim, who gets satisfe the Defendant’s satch, satisfe the Defendant’s satch, and avoided the victim’s satch.”

“To the effect that “” is alleged.

2) The victim himself also tried to prevent the victim from suffering damage from the Defendant’s attempt to avoid suffering damage, when the victim voluntarily resisted the Defendant due to the issue of management expenses, etc.

In this process, the victim is not the assault of the defendant, but the victim.