However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 10, 2006, the Defendant issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court, and on June 3, 201, a summary order of KRW 2 million for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court.

On July 16, 2015, the Defendant driven a blood alcohol concentration of 0.086% from around 930 meters to the front road in the middle Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, Haak-dong, to the front road of the same city, at approximately 200 meters to the front road. The Defendant driven a B low-speed car with alcohol content of 0.086% under the influence of alcohol to this extent.

Accordingly, the Defendant, who violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the same provision.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the state of the operation of a motor vehicle;

1. A copy of a drinking-free measuring instrument;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal records, reply reports (A), investigation reports (reports accompanied by copies of summary orders of identical crimes of a suspect);

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal facts and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, the background of the instant crime, circumstances after the instant crime, etc., is in conflict with the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;