beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.07.09 2015나301685

추심금

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 21, 2012, the Plaintiff provisionally seized the C apartment 303 floor 303 of B owned by Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court, and Daejeon District Court, 2012Kadan525, with loans, etc. of KRW 31.9 million as claims against B on May 21, 2012 (hereinafter “instant provisional seizure”).

(2) The Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against B seeking the payment of the loan, etc. (the same claim as the claim for provisional attachment No. 1 of this case) of KRW 31,90,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the Daegu District Court, Daegu District Court 2,4063. On April 30, 2013, the said court rendered a judgment that “B shall pay the Plaintiff KRW 13,750,00 and its delay damages,” and the said judgment

(3) On May 29, 2012, B deposited KRW 31,90,00 for the cancellation of the execution of the provisional seizure of this case (hereinafter “instant judgment 1”) on May 29, 2012, and the Daegu District Court rendered a decision to revoke the execution of the provisional seizure of this case (hereinafter “Seoul District Court 2012Karo94). Therefore, the provisional seizure of this case 1 was effective against B’s Defendant, and the Plaintiff’s claim of KRW 1,862,00 against B as the claim of the deposit of KRW 1,862,00 against the Defendant, and the provisional seizure of this case was served to the Defendant on May 24, 2013.

(5) On June 24, 2013, the Plaintiff issued a provisional seizure and collection order to transfer the provisional seizure of KRW 14,794,690, out of the above provisional seizure claim against the Defendant in the Daegu District Court and the Daegu District Court and the 2013TTTT 1520,000, the title of execution of the instant provisional seizure was June 24, 2013. The Plaintiff received the provisional seizure and collection order to the Defendant on June 20, 2013 (hereinafter the above provisional seizure and collection order was served on the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as “instant provisional seizure and collection order”).

6) 6)after;