부당이득반환청구
1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.
(a) gold 27,132 won and 5% per annum from October 17, 2013 to October 7, 2014; and
1. On November 14, 2008, the Plaintiff completed the registration of transfer of ownership as of November 14, 2008, No. 14178, with respect to the land B forest No. 65,117 square meters, C forest land No. 338 square meters (hereinafter “each land of this case”). From October 17, 2003, the Defendant does not have any dispute over the attached land No. 22,23,24,25, 27, 27, and 23 square meters among the above B forest No. 65,117 square meters, the attached land No. 27, 27, 300 square meters, among the land of this case, among the land of this case, the attached land No. 27,338 square meters, and the attached land No. 261,36,27,276,27,27, and 2300 square meters, among the land of this case, the attached land No.
Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff the amount equivalent to the rent of KRW 27,132 from January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2013 as the return of unjust enrichment from the use of the instant road site, and the amount equivalent to 5% per annum under the Civil Act from October 17, 2013 to October 7, 2014, which is the day following the day when the duplicate of the instant complaint was served on the Defendant, and to pay damages for delay at each rate of KRW 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the day when the instant complaint was served to the Defendant, and to pay damages for delay at each rate of KRW 7,717 per annum from October 1, 2013 to the day when the instant road is closed or the Plaintiff loses ownership of each of the instant land.
2. Determination on the claim for damages
A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is legitimate, such as that the Defendant did not undergo consultation with D at the time of the construction of the instant road and did not undergo compulsory confinement procedures.