However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is not a person handling narcotics.

1. On August 24, 2012, around 22:00, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 grams of psychotropic drugs in the Ccafeteria located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, (hereinafter referred to as “clockphone”), into a single-use injection machine, and dilution with raw water, and then injected into his arms.

2. On December 2012, the Defendant injected approximately 0.03 grams of clopon into a single-use injection machine at the end of the mid-to-date ccafeteria, and dilution with raw water, and then injected into his arms.

Accordingly, the Defendant administered philophones over twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation of D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to A monetary statements;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., with respect to the relevant criminal facts and the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;