However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On August 26, 2017, the Defendant driven B X-ray vehicles at the road located in front of the Simsan East-dong in the state of under the influence of alcohol content 0.214% among the blood transfusion around 21:05.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire about the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Articles 148-2 (2) 1 and 44-2 (Selection of Imprisonment);

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on the Observation, etc. of Protection and Order to provide community service, order to attend lectures, and order to attend lectures;

(a) Conditions disadvantageous to the defendant: The fact that the defendant's blood alcohol concentration was very high at the time of driving alcohol, and the defendant was punished three times in 203, 2009, and 2010 due to driving of alcohol and refusal to measure drinking;

(b) favorable conditions: The defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case against his mistake, and the fact that he has no record of punishment heavier than the suspension of execution due to drinking driving, etc.

C. The Defendant’s punishment was determined in consideration of the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances before and after the commission of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions specified in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which were revealed in the records of the instant case.