건물명도
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1..
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Furthermore, under Section 6th 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendant concluded a sales contract for the building of this case with the Plaintiff in violation of the obligation under the above repurchase agreement with the Defendant, and the Plaintiff also knew such circumstances. As such, the above sales contract is alleged to the effect that it is null and void in violation of the principle of credit in Article 24 of Chapter 3 of the Regulations on the Establishment and Operation of the GIC. However, as seen earlier, it is difficult to recognize that the Defendant concluded a repurchase agreement with the Defendant that the Defendant would be able to repurchase the building of this case at any time prior to the expiration of the lease term when entering into the sales contract of this case with the Defendant, and there is no other evidence to support this otherwise. Therefore, the Defendant’s assertion on a different premise is without merit.
3. Even if the Defendant’s number of days using the instant building falls short of 111 days due to inevitable reasons, such as the closure of the GIC on the part of the first instance court No. 8th to 5 of the judgment, the fact that even if the GIC’s unilateral closure of the instant building falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period as above, the fact that even if the GIC’s operation falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of the period that falls short of April 2013 to September 2013 is apparent in this court.