beta
(영문) 청주지방법원제천지원 2017.05.31 2015가단3750

대여금

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Determination as to the cause of claim

A. On October 30, 2006, the Plaintiff leased KRW 22,195,130 to the Defendant. Thus, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the borrowed amount of KRW 22,195,130 and the delay damages.

B. According to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, around October 30, 2006, the defendant stated "10/30 of loan Nos. 22,012,740" on the paper of the plaintiff in his/her own pen around October 30, 2006, and delivered the defendant's signature next thereto; the defendant stated "B B2,195,130 of loan paper" on the paper of the plaintiff around October 2006; and the fact that the defendant signed and delivered the defendant to the plaintiff next (hereinafter "each document of this case") is recognized (hereinafter "each document of this case").

2) However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged in light of the aforementioned facts and Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4, and the result of this court’s order to submit certain financial transaction information to the main agricultural cooperative (hereinafter “the main agricultural cooperative”) as a whole, it is insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 22,195,130 to the defendant on Oct. 30, 2006 only on Oct. 30, 2006, the result of this court’s order to submit financial transaction information to the main agricultural cooperative (hereinafter “the main agricultural cooperative”) was insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff lent KRW 22,195,130 to the defendant on Oct. 30, 206. A) The plaintiff was working for the defendant around 206.

) Some of the “F works” from and to E (hereinafter referred to as “the subcontracted works in this case”).

(2) The Plaintiff and the Defendant were in charge of the execution, etc. of funds for the subcontract price to be paid to D while working as the head of D’s field office with respect to the subcontracted work in this case. (2) The subcontracted work in this case continued after the completion of each of the documents in this case, and it should reach the end of February 2007, about four months after the completion of each of the documents in this case.