However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 8. 12. 19:10경 여주시 D 앞 노상에서 이웃인 피해자 E(59세)와 피해자가 피고인과 피해자의 집 사이에 있는 국유지 25평 상당에 농기계를 세워두는 등 개인적으로 사용하고 있다는 이유로 말다툼을 하다가 화가 나서 주먹으로 피해자의 얼굴을 때리고, 몸통을 발로 차고, 이에 대항하는 피해자와 서로 붙잡고 땅바닥에 넘어져 뒹구던 중, 인근 땅바닥에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 낫(칼날길이 18cm)을 집어 들고 피해자에게 휘두를 것처럼 위협을 가하였다.

Therefore, the injured party's loss of the right cited by the defendant is in order to correct the side of the defendant, and the defendant has served as a knife with the right side of the injured party by displaying the improvement.

As a result, the Defendant carried a contribute, which is a dangerous object, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as a two-time therapy, a two-time therapy, and a part-time therapy for about four weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Seizure records;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Each injury diagnosis letter;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of damaged parts);

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., circumstances favorable to the following reasons for sentencing):

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (recognition of the favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing following the suspended sentence);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1)1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act include: (a) the fact that the Defendant, with a deadly weapon, has injured the victim’s head head, thereby not being good; and (b) the degree of injury of the victim is not less than that of the victim; and (c) the Defendant’s view of and reflects his criminal conduct; and (d) the Defendant around May 201.