The defendant shall pay 200,000 won to B who is an applicant for compensation with the money obtained by deception.

3.2

(criminal Power) On January 31, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to one year to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) at the Jung-gu District Court on February 8, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on February 8, 2018, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Ansan Prison on December 15, 20

[Article 2019 Highest 2022]

1. Around 03:00 on September 9, 2019, the Defendant embezzled that he/she had the thought that he/she had without following necessary procedures, such as discovering the victim D’s driver’s license, and the market price in which he/she had an E-credit card, etc., and returning it to the victim, which was located in the neighboring park of the He/sheung-gu Office of He/sheung-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

2. Around September 9, 2019, the Defendant violated the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act and the Defendant calculated the price for 1 A tobacco equivalent to the amount of 4,500 won in the market price at “G convenience store” located in Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, and presented it as if the Defendant was a legitimate holder of the E-credit card in the name of the victim D, who acquired as referred to in paragraph (1), and thereby, had an employee pay the said amount, thereby using the lost credit card and acquiring the pecuniary profit equivalent to 4,500 won.

3. Forgery of a private document, uttering of a private document, or uttering of an official document by fraudulent means, or fraud;

A. On September 10, 2019, the Defendant committed the crime at around 14:00 on September 14:00, 2019, without authority for the purpose of exercising, at “I agency located in Heung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government,” the Defendant entered “D” in the customer column of the application for subscription to a new contract for mobile phones, signed at will next thereto, forged one copy of the new contract for mobile phones in the name of D, which is a private document concerning the rights and obligations, and issued one copy of the forged new contract for mobile phones to the I agency staff J as if the document was duly formed. The Defendant is a public document that he/she acquired as provided by J under paragraph (1).