However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 12, 2020, around 19:14, the Defendant expressed a 112 report and received a request to return home from the police officer D (the age of 48) assigned to the Ansan-gu Police Station C police box of the Ansan-gu, Ansan-gu, the Defendant: (a) called “Ising to go home to the air transport unit; (b) I am going to go home to the customers; and (c) I am to the nearby public bath, and (d) the police officer asked to stop and return home to the Defendant; and (b) the Defendant again demanded that I am to stop the Defendant, and (c) the Defendant saw “Is to go home to the same bitch, bitch,” and assaulted the chest of the said police officer once by drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers in charge of handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment of motion pictures);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act include the following: (a) the degree of the type of force the Defendant exercised against police officers; and (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be comprehensively considered.