건축법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (two years of suspended sentence to six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Although the Defendant’s judgment was in profoundly against the instant crime, the Defendant did not know even if he committed a violation of the Building Act even around August 23, 2016, and again committed the instant crime. In full view of the Defendant’s age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, it is not deemed unfair, given that the Defendant’s aforementioned assertion is groundless.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.