However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 20:00 on May 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 100,000 from the police officer who found the customer by pretending him/her, and (b) entered E as a smuggling in order to guide him/her to engage in similar intercourse.

In addition, from October 201 to the above temporary date, the Defendant arranged many unspecified male and female workers, including E, to engage in sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police investigation report (the No. 1, 5 of the evidence list);

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc., collectively, through the relevant Articles of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act / [Types of Crimes] Aggravation of Punishment of the Act on Probation and Order to Attend / Aggravated Punishment of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc. - Aggravation of long-term crimes [Scope of Specific Punishment and Recommendation] - One year or more years of imprisonment [Determination of Sentence] - 40 hours of probation attending three years of probation for one year and six months of probation / The above sentencing factors and the defendant committed the crime of this case even though they had the past record of criminal punishment for the same crime, the defendant's risk of repeating crimes is considerably high in light of the criminal records of the same kind, and the defendant's mistake is recognized.