beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.03.08 2016고단8549

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for 8 months and fines for 5,00,000 won, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine for 5,00,000 won, Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment for 6 months and 6 months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, C, and D’s joint crime is a business owner operating a sexual traffic establishment under the trade name of “K” on the first floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul J building, Gangnam-gu, and Defendant C is a general manager, Defendant D is a day-time manager, Defendant D is a day-time manager, and L (pre-determined to be separated) is a person who has worked as a night chief.

The Defendants, together from July 25, 2016 to September 28, 2016 (Provided, That from August 29, 2016, from August 2016 to September 28, 2016, Defendant A advertised businesses on the Internet sites, such as “M”, “N”, and “O” and controlled the management of revenues, etc.; Defendant C is in charge of receiving commercial sex acts, preparing and advertising sites, and providing guidance, and arranging commercial sex acts in collusion with employees, such as E, by receiving KRW 130,00 or KRW 200,00 from male and female buyers who found their places of business after reporting advertisements.

2. On July 2016, Defendant B agreed to pay KRW 150,000 per month from A in return for a false statement at an investigative agency as if he/she was a business owner and instead of punishment if the above business place is controlled by an investigative agency between A and B, the main owner of the business place of K sexual traffic, which is the business owner of the above business place.

In accordance with the above agreement, the defendant was delivered in cash KRW 4.5 million each month from July 2016 to September 2016 by the defendant, and when the above establishment was controlled by the police on September 28, 2016, at around 18:40 on September 28, 2016, the defendant was instructed by A to carry out the operation of the above establishment as the owner of the operation of the establishment as the owner of the operation of the establishment as the owner of the establishment, attend the police as the owner of the operation, and received an answer from the police on September 28, 2016, and delivered the contents to be asked by the police on September 28, 2016.