명예훼손
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On May 23, 2014, Defendant A damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts to the victim, at the Incheon District Court’s Busan District Court’s Busan District Branch Branch, located in 129, where Defendant A got on the Defendant’s board, and attempted to leave the victim after causing injury to the victim’s Z while driving the Defendant, and then causing damage to the victim’s Z.
2. Determination
A. The facts charged in a criminal trial must be proved by the prosecutor, and the judge should admit the defendant guilty with probative value, which leads to the conviction that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, even if there is doubt as to the defendant's guilt, it is inevitable to determine the defendant's interest (Supreme Court Decision 2002Do5662 Delivered on December 24, 2002). B. Na. In light of the following circumstances, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is sufficient to consider.
In addition, it is difficult to conclude that the defendant made the above remarks.
Even if the horses indicate false facts, or it is insufficient to conclude that the Defendant had a criminal intent to harm the victim’s reputation publicly, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.
1) First of all, the defendant mentioned above in the same time, place, and circumstances as the victim’s statement to supplement the facts charged or its supplement.
It is difficult to see it.
A) As evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, there are statements in AA, F and T including the victim’s Z and in this court.
The main contents of these statements are ① The defendant is trying to shock the Z while leaving the Z while moving back the Z and trying to leave it as it is.