폐기물처리사업계획서반려처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning for this case is as follows, except for the addition or modification as follows, the court cites this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The 4 pages 2 of the first instance judgment shall be changed to "waste".
For the same 5th page, "the second" under the first table shall be changed to "the third".
The first "2017" for the 11st day of the same 9th day shall be changed to "2016".
the same 9 pages 16 et al.
The following shall be added: at the bottom of the same nine pages, the second "third-party" shall be added from 2006 to 2007 ".." The third-party "the third-party" of the first 9 pages shall be changed to "the fourth-party". The second-party "the fourth-party" of the same nine pages shall be changed to "the fourth-party". The second-party "the third-party" of the same 10
"Postwards" [The Fourth (201~2012) National Waste Statistical Research by the Ministry of Environment) is a third-party (2006-207-2007-2007-2% of the total generation unit compared to the National Waste Statistical Research). Thus, considering the increase of 8.2% of the total generation unit calculated on the basis of the latter, the number of 0.346km/person days calculated on the basis of the latter shall not extend to 0.9404km/person days claimed by the Plaintiff, even if considering the increase of 8.2% by the latter.
In addition, the 11th page "in addition" shall be changed to "additional". The 11th page "transporter" shall be changed to "transporter". The 11th page "in addition" shall be changed to "transporter".
2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.