beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.01.18 2016가합300

용역비

Text

1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) and the Defendant C jointly and severally filed against the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 152,237,709 and the aforementioned amount on June 201, 2013.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who is engaged in surface treatment business, such as painting, with the trade name of “D,” and Defendant B is a business operator of the business of manufacturing printed parts, such as printing scamets, and Defendant C is a spouse of Defendant B, who actually operates the “E”.

B. 1) The Plaintiff and the Defendants, around September 2008, shall use the terms used by the Plaintiff as they are for convenience the terms used by the Defendants for printing kives (the terms used by the parties) supplied by the Defendants.

(3) In the event that the Defendants conduct strawing and supply the strawing to the Defendants, the Defendants are obligated to pay the strawing price to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant strawing contract”).

(2) The Plaintiff concluded a contract with the Defendants from September 2008 to May 2013, 2008, and supplied strawing to the strawet supplied by the Defendants.

3) The Defendants informed the Plaintiff of defective quality as indicated below in their transactions with the Plaintiff. The Defendants informed the Plaintiff of the content of the No. 13 of the 201 date as indicated below. The 16-2 of the supply in March 3, 2011, Fax A8-2 of the 2011, B-82 of the supply in May 3, 2011, 4 inferior 8-3 of the supply in April 201, and 2-7 2-73 of the supply in June 1, 2011, and 20-18 of the 20-18-2 of the supply in June 1, 201, and 20-1 of the 20-18-2 of the defective 20-18-1 of the supply in June 1, 2011, and 20-14 of the 20-18-18-1, 2011.

This paper aims to cooperate in the rapid work of the ordered volume as soon as possible.