beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 서산지원 2014.02.07 2013고정286

정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged was connected to D on November 16, 2012 at the Sinsan-si Office, 16:28, and the Defendant “F” as the title “F” in relation to the Internet article “F” written by E reporters, is known as a gymore, with the knowledge that it is a gymore, and gymor, with the knowledge of whether it is a gymorgor, and the fact that it was an gymor, with the knowledge of the fact that it was an gymor, and abused the law, thereby deducting G G G from the gymor, who was asked first, in the U.S., and was not in Korea, and the gymormor, without the knowledge of the fact that it was an gymor, so that it was an gymor, without the knowledge of the fact that it was an gymor, an gymoral shock, and that it was an gymor.

However, there was no fact that the victims' children returned to the United Kingdom on June 5, 2012 and were appointed as the successor pastor in accordance with due process at the church personnel management council around October 2012. There was no fact that the victims appointed the children who were not in the Republic of Korea as the successor pastor unlawfully.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging public false information through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

2. The above facts charged constitute an offense falling under Article 70(2) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. and charged against the victim’s express intent pursuant to Article 70(3) of the same Act.