However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Around 23:50 on March 2013, the Defendant: (a) found the Defendant in a state of drinking in the “C restaurant” operated by the victim D at around 23:50 on March 2013; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant’s business by forcing the Defendant to drink and drink the Defendant “hing the flusium going to the sexual watch while going to the sexual watch while going to the sexual watch; and (c) obstructed the Defendant’s restaurant’s business by force by forcing the customers on the side tables for about two hours; and (d) interfered with the Defendant’s restaurant’s business by obstructing the Defendant’s restaurant business by having the Defendant go to go to the sexual watch for five hours from the same day to October 23:5, 2013, as indicated in [Attachment] Nos. 1 to 5 of the List of Crimes No. 1 to 23:50 on October 2013.

2. On December 23, 2013, at around 23:00, the Defendant’s interference with the business in E found in the state of drinking alcohol to “E operated by the victim F in the afterma at around 23:00, and expressed the victim’s desire to “a case where the victim would die or would be able to die,” and the victim’s desire to “a case where the victim would die because he would return to the end of his business,” and interfere with the victim’s restaurant business by avoiding disturbance by force for about 30 minutes, such as cutting off the opening of the door and shaking by hand, and interfering with the victim’s restaurant business by driving it three times from the same day to February 2, 2014 as indicated in the attached list Nos. 6 through 8.

3. On November 1, 2014, around 19:00, the Defendant was found to be in a state of drinking in the “Gju store operated by the victim H at around 19:00, while drinking in the middle of the Gju, and the Defendant came to be in a state of drinking out of the “Gju store operated by the victim H at around 19:0.” While coming to another customer, the Defendant was called to be in a state of drinking for the victim of the defect that the victim would have been melting, “the victim would be Chewing.” The Defendant’s failure to perform a bath for about one hour, i.e., getting the other customers out of the country.