When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On December 24, 2013, at around 16:00, the Defendant: (a) in E restaurant operated by the victim D(54 years of age) in the Daejeon Pungdong-gu Daejeon Pungdong-gu C, the Defendant said that “I am hyddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on injury diagnosis certificates, each photograph, video CDs and video CDs;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that even if the defendant had the same criminal record, it is inevitable to strictly punish the crime of this case.

However, the defendant is led to confession and reflect in depth, and the circumstances that can be considered in light of the motive and circumstances of the crime are observed.

In this context, considering all the circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family form, means and result of the crime, the circumstances after the crime is committed, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.