Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

1. From April 15, 2014 to June 30, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business, posted an incentive on the wall side of the first floor of the Ctel of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, stating that “D would not pay management expenses to D in the future, because a person is unable to manage his/her business,” and distributed a separate notice of payment of management expenses, stating “A: community credit cooperatives, deposit holders: A: the E company, and the State: (a) in the future, it absolutely pays management expenses to non-residents, and received the remittance of management expenses.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the management of officetels, such as collection of management fees of victim D by fraudulent means.

2. On May 2014, the Defendant posted a printed article on the wall side of the elevator of the first floor of the Ctel as follows: “DC has received management expenses for up to six months and has paid the electricity and water rate for the up to six months and has already been used individually. If DC cannot be left alone any longer, it has requested a large portion of the occupants to help do so. The Defendant attached a printed article on the wall of the elevator of the first floor of the Ctel, stating “A person who is unable to perform his/her duties in the building of the Southern Court.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not use management expenses individually, and the decision of suspension of duties is that the F will suspend the execution of duties in the case that D files a claim against F.

The Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

3. Damage to property;

A. On May 24, 2014, the Defendant destroyed and damaged a notice of demand for the payment of management expenses attached by the victim on the wall side of the elevator of the first floor of the instant Ctel, which was cut, and added to some of the management rules.

B. Around June 6, 2014, the Defendant arbitrarily removed and destroyed the management rules attached to the wall of the victim at the same place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police of D. D.