If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

1. The Defendant interfering with his/her business: (a) at a 'D' restaurant located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from April 29, 2017 to October 20 of the same day; and (b) at a 'D' restaurant located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, bitch bitch

“Absinging the Defendant,” and the Defendant’s statement to the customer “I am sing, N am sing, I am sing.”

“The victim E-cafeteria business was obstructed by force by avoiding disturbance, such as raising city expenses, etc.

2. Around 10:40 on April 29, 2017, the Defendant obstructed the performance of official duties, at the Seongdong-gu Police Station in Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, for the purpose of not entering the king Police Station in Seongdong-gu, Seoul, and into the above Seoul Sungdong Police Station, where a flagrant offender was arrested and arrived, and obstructed the legitimate performance of official duties of police officers in order to keep the G(31) of the police box belonging to the Seoul Sungdong Police Station, and to keep the above G’s bridge out of the protection room in the above Seoul Sungdong Police Station, and to keep the above G’s bridge out of the protection room in Sungdong, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to E and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties) (the point of disturbance in the official document and

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of all the conditions of sentencing, including the defendant's age, environment, motive and background of the crime, etc., in light of the following: (a) there is no previous conviction exceeding the same kind of reason and fine for the punishment under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act; (b) confession as an contingent crime committed under the influence of alcohol; (c) the confession is against the victim of the obstruction of business; and

Rejection of Public Prosecution

1. The Defendant is in Seongdong-gu Seoul on April 29, 2017 in Seongdong-gu Seoul around 09:45.