전자금융거래법위반
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence imposed by the court below (one year of imprisonment, etc.) is too unreasonable.
2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s confessioning of the instant crime and having no record of the same kind of crime.
However, the crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act is highly likely to be abused as a means of criminal acts, such as the safety and reliability of financial transactions through electronic media, as well as various scams, etc., the Defendant advertised that he transfers the electronic medium, and keeps the physical card necessary for the electronic financial transaction. The Defendant is more severe than simply transferring his electronic medium, and the crime is punished once by a fine, the Defendant has the record of being punished several times by a juvenile protective disposition, there is no change in the circumstance that may be considered in the trial, and other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, family relationship, the means and consequence of the crime, etc., which are conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, are considered as inappropriate.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.