beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2015.07.24 2015고단1417

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B Kazon.

1. On May 24, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), at around 0.134% of alcohol concentration in blood, was driving directly in front of the D vehicle maintenance shop in Kimpo-si C at Kimpo-si at a speed of about 40km from both sides of the road at the speed of string away from the string of the water.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle shall not drive the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as to inflict any danger and injury on others according to the road traffic conditions and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and has a duty of care to prevent accidents by reporting the front side and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, was negligent in driving in the front of the vehicle, and the Defendant, due to the traffic congestion, shocked the back-paner of the F rocketing car driven by the injured Party E (the age of 46) waiting in the front of the front line with the front-paner of the said passenger vehicle, and then shocked the back-paner of the Hene car driven by the injured Party G (the age of 41) waiting in the front line.

After all, the Defendant suffered, by these occupational negligence, the injury of the victim E, knee-shne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-kne-hne-hne-hne-hne-kne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-hne-h

2. The Defendant, as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, driven a fluorous vehicle with the blood alcohol concentration of about 2 km from the section of approximately 0.134% to the road of the same accident site, in a temporary border, such as those as stated in paragraph (1) of this Article, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.134%.

b)a summary of the evidence;