except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 28, 2018, at around 02:10, the Defendant: (a) on the street in front of “C” located in Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, a considerable amount of Cheongju-si, and reported the instant 112; (b) sent to the site by the Cheongju-si Police Station D District Police Station E; (c) was arrested by the Defendant as a flagrant offender suspected of assault; and (d) attempted to take the Defendant into the patrol vehicle after arresting F as a flagrant offender committing an assault; (c) took a bath to the said police officer; and (d) threatened the police officer that “I am fright, because I am fright, I am bad, I am off”; (d) the back of the patrol vehicle for about 10 minutes; and (e) prevented police officers from carrying the G into a flagrant offender, by preventing him from carrying the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report the occurrence of cases;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the fact that he/she has no record of the suspension of the execution of the same kind or more, and the fact that he/she