2. The judgment of the defendant recognized and reflected each of the crimes of this case, the significant part of the damaged goods were returned to the victim, and even though the defendant is recognized as having reached an agreement with the victimN and Q, the defendant has a history of being sentenced to juvenile protective disposition or sentenced to imprisonment or sentenced to criminal punishment for suspended execution, and the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case repeatedly and repeatedly in a short period without being aware of it during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with most victims, and the defendant did not reach an agreement with the other victims, and taking into account various sentencing conditions of this case, including age, sex, environment, motive and background of the crime of this case, the motive and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., it is not determined that the sentence

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.