On December 2, 2014, the Defendant called the victim E residing in the Seocho-si Donman on 12, 2014, and called the victim E, “to build and sell the west Don in the former Young-gun.”

Along with the loan of KRW 150 million, the loan was constructed and sold within two to three months, and then the loan was sold in lots, and then the loan was made in a false manner to pay profits equivalent to the principal and principal.

However, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the injured party, he/she did not have any intent or ability to sell the funds by constructing a loan to the Southern-gun within two to three months, or to pay the principal and corresponding profits to the injured party.

Around December 8, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, received KRW 150 million from the Agricultural Cooperative Account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant from the victim to the money borrowed from the victim, and acquired it by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement concerning the suspect interrogation protocol of the defendant by the prosecution;

1. Statement protocol by the police for E;

1. A certificate of borrowing, a certificate of verifying transaction details, and a copy of passbook;

1. A criminal investigation report (including written statements between the complainant and the defendant), and text message;

1. Application of investigation reports (related to the attachment of a detailed statement of deposit transactions) and the details of account transactions to statutes;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds that the relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime is higher than that of imprisonment;