A. The Prosecutor’s sentence (6 months) is too unhued and unfair.

B. The lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the judgment defendant acknowledges and reflects all of the crimes, and that it is the primary offender who had no record of criminal punishment prior to the instant case is favorable to the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that there are many money that the defendant acquired by deception to the victims, most of them are not repaid, and that there is no agreement with the victims is disadvantageous.

In addition, comprehensively taking account of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances following the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, and environment, etc., the Prosecutor and the Defendant’s assertion are without merit, on the grounds that the lower court’s punishment is too weak or unreasonable.

3. The final prosecutor and the defendant’s appeal are all groundless, and they are all dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.