성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
1. Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.
2. The Defendants did not pay the above fine.
Punishment of the crime
1. Commercial sex trafficking C is a real business owner who receives most of the profits from the operation of 17 commercial sex trafficking businesses, ordering the Defendants to take charge of the overall operation of 17 commercial sex trafficking businesses, and the Defendants are managers of each business place in charge of delivering earnings to employees such as studio-leased women who are operated as commercial sex trade business establishments under the above C, and D and E are employees who work for the above commercial sex trade business establishments, such as D and E, and have been in charge of supplies management, customer guidance, earnings collection, etc. in the business place.
The Defendants: (a) leased several studios in the vicinity of the area where entertainment establishments, such as the above C, etc., Daegu, etc., and (b) recruited sex-related women through the dispatch of text messages for writing, etc., and (c) invited them to engage in the business of “officetel” in order to enable them to engage in sexual traffic with women at the above studio.
Defendant
B B B B From December 2013 to August 2014, 2014, at the same 16 studio as indicated in the table of attached Form 1 to 10, such as Daegu Suwon-gu G Studio 201, etc. Furthermore, from December 2013 to September 24, 2014, Defendant A entered in the daily table of attached Form 201, such as the above G Studio 201, etc. B succeeds to or designate the studio to be used as a commercial sex business establishment, and C succeeds to or designates the studio used as a commercial sex business establishment, and performs overall control over the operation teams of the commercial sex business establishment, such as receiving a daily revenue after connecting the women who will work at the same place, and the Defendants sent a commercial sex trafficking, or recruit female job seeking through the Internet job offering site, and pursuant to C’s instructions, use of the pre-contract text message to the “specific male mobile phone,” and “a mobile phone entry” to the Defendants.