except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

The Defendant, around 04:20 on August 12, 2012, around 04:20, had 3 lanes prior to the D market in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, take the side of the driver’s seat of G driving, plpling and digging up the hand-on hand to the right side while driving the 3-lanes due to the problem of victim E, E, E, and taxi fares.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim E in operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning E and G;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each photograph, video CD-related statute;

1. Article 5-10 (1) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Selection of Punishment: Article 5-10 (1) of the same Act;

1. Suspension of execution: Part of not guilty under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Considering circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant is the first offender, the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim E and G, the fact that the defendant committed contingently, the degree of each damage

1. On August 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 04:20 on August 12, 2012, the summary of this part of the facts charged: (b) around 04:20, the Defendant: (c) in the Fststayna taxi operating along two laness of the D market located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, the Defendant was able to plpl up the victim’s Hand to the right side while bucking off the car with the victim’s E and taxi rate.

Accordingly, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim G by using a taxi, which is a dangerous object, on approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and damaged the victim G by adding the repair cost to KRW 1,470,113.

2. Each of the evidence submitted by the judgment prosecutor alone is insufficient to recognize that the defendant was plucking or plucking the above Hand, even though the defendant knew that the above G driving vehicle is on the side, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

Rather, the witness E in this court, and the defendant at the time.