However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who operates a C Game Center in B at the time of racing.

No one shall provide information on the distribution or use of a game product with a content different from that of the rating, or display or store such product for such purpose.

Nevertheless, from June 26, 2017 to September 26, 2017, the Defendant installed 60 game “one thousandth shoulder in the year,” which was modified to put up a troke, on the background screen differently from the contents of the rating classified by the Game Water Management Committee, and offered 60 games to unspecified customers for use by many, unspecified customers.

As a result, the defendant provided game water different from the classification of classification for use.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to replys as a result of each appraisal;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, and Articles 45 subparagraph 4 and 32 (1) 2 of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry, and Selection of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Type 1 (the classification of class and the provision for the use of game products different from the classification of class) basic area (six months to one year and two months) of the recommended punishment according to the sentencing criteria, including the scope of the recommended punishment and the provision for the use of illegal game products;

2. The act of using and providing game water, the contents of which are different from those of the rating of a sentence, is not such an act that impedes the promotion of the game industry and the establishment of a healthy game culture of the people.

However, the defendant seems to have recognized all of the crimes of this case and against it.

Specific circumstances such as the size and operation period of game products used for crime, and the age, occupation, sex, family relationship, and circumstances before and after crime are revealed.