2. The facts that the defendant recognized his mistake, and some of the amount of the fraud is deemed to have been used for the instant freezing market building project are favorable circumstances, but the sum of the amount obtained by deception is a large amount of KRW 140 million, the defendant has a majority of the criminal records of fraud, the defendant committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment on June 19, 2008 due to fraud, etc. on June 19, 2008, and committed the instant crime during the period of suspension of execution, and did not agree with the victims. In full view of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, circumstances after the commission of the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, etc., the court below's punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.