beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2013.04.12 2012고합208

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(보복협박등)

Text

One year of imprisonment with prison labor and eight months of imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes set forth in the judgment of the defendant 1.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 12, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Ulsan District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on May 20, 201.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Crime Intimidation, etc.) requested the victim to reach an agreement with respect to the injury inflicted upon him when he was the wife of the Defendant, but the victim did not reach an agreement, but threatened the victim by having received the statement from the police around March 12, 201 in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, 903-1, on the purpose of retaliation for the victim’s statement from the police as the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, from January 201 to March 12, 2011, threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliationing a statement in relation to the investigation of a criminal case in the same way five times as shown in the attached Table Nos. 1 to 5, 2011.

2. Around August 16, 2011, the Defendant: (a) prepared a letter stating that “it is necessary to know that the correspondence was used without the consent of the party concerned; (b) it would have been used without the consent of the party concerned; and (c) made the victim reach the victim’s arrival with the aim of retaliation against the victim, as set forth in the preceding paragraph; and (d) made it possible for the victim to have the victim reach the victim.

In addition, the Defendant, from July 14, 201 to November 4, 2011, threatened the victim with the purpose of retaliationing a statement in relation to the investigation of a criminal case in the same manner three times as indicated in the attached Table Nos. 6 to 8, 2011.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;