On September 30, 2015, the Defendant prepared a false complaint with respect to C using a shot pen kept in the place for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment from the civil petition office of the original police station, which is located in the original city in the original city in the original city, with the intention of having C receive criminal punishment.

The written complaint states, "The defendant defendant C was issued KRW 86,80,000,000 as the purchase price of a motor vehicle on five occasions from September 14, 2015 to September 14, 2015 after receiving a transfer of KRW 100,000,000 as the down payment from the complainant around August 20, 2015 upon the request of the complainant to identify the used motor vehicle in the form of a used vehicle in the first city in the first city, from the complainant around August 20, 2015, and the defendant did not lend the above C with KRW 6,70,000,000 as the purchase price of a used motor vehicle in addition to the loan lending of KRW 8,00,000 to the above C as the rent of a used motor vehicle."

Nevertheless, on September 30, 2015, the defendant submitted the above complaint to the police officer who is unable to know his name in the public service center of the above main police station and filed the complaint with C.

Summary of Evidence

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a copy of records on fraudulent cases, No. 2016-type 175);

1. Article 156 of the Criminal Act and Article 156 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;