However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. All facts;

A. The Defendant is a person who served as an I civilian military employee in the H flight team from the H flight team to December 30, 2009 and entered the J on November 19, 2012 (hereinafter “J”) and takes charge of M (hereinafter “M”)’s technical expert member belonging to the K of the K of the K and the chief L of the office (each indictment on detention on March 23, 2015) and takes charge of inspection and delivery of quality inspectors of national defense technology, A/S, etc.

B. On December 29, 201, J entered into a supply contract with the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and M/M with the purport that “The supply will be 23,535,492,192 won by October 30, 201, supply will be 23,535,492,192” connected to the Defense Acquisition Program Administration’s office located in the J Headquarters N in Sung-si.

The general terms and conditions of the above contract shall comply with the provisions regarding the delivery date, size, inspection, etc., and all the goods shall be a new product that meets the purpose of purchase (Article 13). Under the provisions of this Act, the National Defense Technology Quality Institute (hereinafter “Quality Guarantee Institute”), which is a quality assurance institution, an inspection of the goods’ supervision through special terms and conditions of contract, an inspection shall be conducted pursuant to the provisions of this Act, which is established as a quality assurance institution (hereinafter “cost”). The manufacture of a prototype and the subsequent production shall be commenced after the inspection of the performance of the goods (Article 7 and Article 47 shall be stated as “Article 14,” while the facts charged in this case are stated as “Article 14,” according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, it is apparent that this is a clerical error and thus

In addition, both parties stipulate that the size and weight of the equipment, as well as temperature, pressure, output, internal structure, and the permissible range of the electric system, should be determined by the special terms and conditions of the contract, and that all technical data should be the latest as determined at the time of the conclusion of the contract, and meet the O specifications and the company's proposal (Articles 31 and 50).