2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

1. Injury;

A. At around 02:00 on November 5, 201, the Defendant: (a) performed drinking together with the victim D (n, 44 years of age) on the ground that the victim was negligent in his/her friendship; (b) caused the Defendant’s injury, i.e., the victim’s head to the port of wharf; (c) 3 times the victim’s head to the port of wharf; (d) 3 times the victim’s head to the port of wharf; and (e) 4 weeks the victim’s head to the victim when 3 times the victim’s knife buck.

B. On February 22, 2012, around 23:00, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D, in front of the F Clothing operated by the victim D in Kimhae-si, the Defendant: (a) while engaging in a dispute with the victim; (b) shaking the victim’s head debt; (c) was shaking the victim’s face face; and (d) was inflicted on the victim for approximately 21 days, in case where approximately 3 times the victim’s face face face was over three times due to lush, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim, such as an inner spathy, spac

2. On January 16, 2012, the Defendant defamationd the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts, such as “D going on and off the Ecuas H car,” even though the victim D did not take a fraud and escape from the Defendant. However, the Defendant did not receive any communication from the G who was working in the said Ecuas H car, even though he did not receive any loan of KRW 30 million to D. However, the Defendant was subject to fraud. As D was going to escape, D was able to have a escape.”

3. Damage to property;

A. On January 18, 2012, around 04:00, the Defendant destroyed a copy of the front door glass owned by the victim who could not know the market price by generating the victim’s door glass. In the house of the second floor victim D located in Kimhae-si, Kim Jong-si, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s front door glass.

B. The defendant above

1.(b)

At the same time, at the same place as the paragraph, the victim D had a conflict with the victim D, but when the victim's market value is 340,000 won, the mobile phone stamping was stored on the floor and damaged.

b)a summary of the evidence;