When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who operates a lighting company's "D" in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and around 2006, the victim E who operates an advertising company's advertisement for one year's publication in the magazine, and the advertising expenses will be paid as goods using the ED lighting.

'We talk about ''.

However, at the time, the defendant did not have the ability to pay the advertising price normally because the credit price liability amounted to 300 million won and the defendant did not receive the price of the goods.

The Defendant made a false statement to the victim, and caused the victim to publish the advertisement in a magazine from December 2, 2006 to October 2007, thereby obtaining the benefit of KRW 9.6 million as advertising expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Protocol of examination of witnesses regarding E;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the accused;

1. Application of the statutes governing a copy of an advertising contract;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;